The Nordic Africa Institute – Publications

nai.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Farmers’ willingness to adopt precision agricultural technologies to reduce mycotoxin contamination in grain: evidence from grain farmers in Spain and Lithuania
Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Agricultural Economics, Extension & Rural Development, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa; Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
The Nordic Africa Institute, Research Unit. Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6764-1887
Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Aerospace Engineering and Fluid Mechanics Department, Universidad de Sevilla, Seville, Spain.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Precision Agriculture, ISSN 1385-2256, E-ISSN 1573-1618, Vol. 25, p. 2292-2320Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

PurposeThis study examines the willingness of Spanish and Lithuanian grain farmers to adopt a combined approach of preventive site-specific spraying (PSSS) and selective harvesting (SH), two precision agricultural technologies (below referred to as PSSS-SH) aimed at mitigating the risk of mycotoxin contamination in barley and wheat.

MethodsData were collected from 190 commercial grain farmers using a choice experimental survey. The empirical analysis relied on the estimation of mixed logit and integrated latent class models.

ResultsThe surveyed farmers were heterogeneous in their preference for the PSSS-SH technology, with a majority (81%) reporting that they were willing to adopt and pay for the PSSS-SH technology. Furthermore, the farmers’ willingness to adopt PSSS-SH technology was influenced by the trade-offs between the potential production, economic and environmental changes.

ConclusionProfit maximization is not the only motivation for a farmer’s decision to adopt PSSS-SH, there are also important non-financial benefits that align with the observed choices. Furthermore, the perceived usefulness of the technology, the willingness and readiness to use the technology, and the farmer characteristics (e.g. cooperative membership, employment status, share of household income from grain production and past experience with precision farming technology) were positively associated with uptake of the PSSS-SH technology. Therefore, extension programmes should have a special focus on the perceived usefulness of the technology, the willingness and readiness of farmers to use it, and its unique characteristics.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 25, p. 2292-2320
National Category
Other Agricultural Sciences Other Engineering and Technologies Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:nai:diva-2971DOI: 10.1007/s11119-024-10167-4OAI: oai:DiVA.org:nai-2971DiVA, id: diva2:1885579
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2020-02728Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesAvailable from: 2024-07-24 Created: 2024-07-24 Last updated: 2025-01-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Abu Hatab, Assem
By organisation
Research Unit
In the same journal
Precision Agriculture
Other Agricultural SciencesOther Engineering and TechnologiesSocial Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 147 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf